Hence, the ruling is still standing (which was pro-taxpayer), but the effective date is on hold allowing Maryland time to petition the U.S. Supreme Court.
For previous posts on Wynne, go to WYNNE CASE UPDATE.
The MFA is expected to face more resistance in the House.
WHAT IS REALLY FAIR?
I think the article in USA TODAY raises an interesting point - brick and mortar businesses currently only collect sales tax in the state where they have a store. Online businesses currently only collect sales tax in the state where they are based. Isn't that fair? Why should online businesses now have to collect sales tax in any state in which they have a sale but no physical location? Brick and mortar businesses don't have to do that. Isn't that discouraging online businesses and encouraging brick and mortar businesses? Is that really "leveling" the playing field or "tilting" it in the direction of brick and mortar businesses? Or is tilting the playing field in favor of large online businesses against small online businesses?
HOW WILL YOU COMPLY?
Regardless of whether it is constitutional or it levels the playing field or doesn't, is a battle between big and small businesses, is unfair, is more fair or will cause the growth of Internet sales to diminish - one thing is certain - if it is enacted, businesses will have to figure out how to comply without hurting their businesses.
States are supposed to simplify their tax codes and provide software to help businesses comply. During that process, companies will have to decide if they are going to hire someone in-house to handle the compliance or hire an outside firm to handle. Finding the right outside consultant at the right price may be the difference.
If this is enacted and you need help, please contact me to discuss how to find the best resource for your company.
For more info on the Marketplace Fairness Act, check out my earlier post: The Marketplace Fairness Act: Is It Really Fair?